As long as they can can prop up the valuation for a short time, they can capitalize shortly after an IPO and externalize the losses on unwitting millions of people who came to own some unicorn stock because they were auto-enrolled in the 2055 retirement mix of some bottom scraping asset manager that charges high fees on a portfolio with loose definitions of what it can invest in.
(although, to be fair, Blue Apron is an obvious case of the next groupon.)
It's also bad for regular employees. They have to stay on for very long before can make some money.
Making ~4x the (approximate) real valuation (which is already probably way higher than what they paid per share to invest) probably meant a significant return. Kind of like private equity strategy from inside a start-up.
I’m sure that employees with relatively low amounts of options plus a lockup period, needing to use their own money to buy the stock, with some more recent employees at relatively bad strike prices by comparison, did get screwed over.
Which is why you never, never accept options-based equity as compensation, and never accept an ultimatum between a competitive salary + low equity vs. less than market salary + higher equity. The lottery winners for whom these arrangements worked out should not factor into your judgment. And likely any experienced engineers should be requiring bonuses, meaningful severance, comprehensive insurance and a host of other forms of compensation.
basically would have just been a losing gamble to have withheld money instead instead of it being something forced upon them