So if I get your drift, someday you'll support the "freedom of expression" of terrorists?
The church is known to indulge in borderline terrorism, just fyi. This is at least in the case of India. We suffer it every single day.
The church is known to indulge in borderline terrorism, just fyi. This is at least in the case of India. We suffer it every single day.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Edit: looking further, since you have a history of abusing HN in this way, I've banned the account. Please don't create accounts to break the site guidelines with.
And even Christians in the US can get on the wrong side of this. My old church has a Hispanic congregation that worships in the early afternoon, and some ICE agents came by, not to worship, but because they heard there was a "large Hispanic celebration." My pastor dragged them out. https://theintercept.com/2018/01/19/ice-new-sanctuary-moveme... I can see a very small distance from where we are in the US to declaring that sanctuary churches are aiding terrorism, to defining (as in China) a state-friendly Christianity that is acceptable because it reinforces the desired social engineering of the powerful and a rogue Christianity whose believers need to be arrested for reasons of national security.
(Full disclosure, I am ethnically an Indian "St. Thomas Christian," and although I was born and live in America I was baptized in India, so I might be slightly reacting to your comment out of that. I don't think I am, though, although I certainly haven't kept up with the facts on the ground in India.)
What? Then prosecute, not persecute, in India.