Negative view: they're blocking people from circumventing their paid features
Positive view: they're protecting their other users from getting spammed
If LinkedIn offered API access to messaging in a way that let CRMs work with them instead of feel forced to circumvent them I think most who want to use it legitimately would be perfectly happy to have LinkedIn impose various usage limits and peotections even if paid.
They should see this as revenue potential: there are lots of potential to get companies with legitimate reasons for more integration than the current API to upsell their customers on paid LinkedIn features if they are able to offer it in an approved way, and I bet many would be happy to let LinkedIn monitor how it's used.
If they try to block access instead, they'll find more and more companies keep offering the same, but manually.
Got the dropbox extension, show an option to upload your resume from dropbox directly. etc.
Blocking ads, show integrated ads through a secondary channel.
I only created a linkedin account to stop all the email invites... and even then, refuse to install their app (links pervasive in mobile web) and only accept connections to those I've met personally, and very few recruiters.
That's a funny story. But I have a funnier one. Not long ago, maybe the last time LinkedIn came up on HN, I created a test LinkedIn account as Mirimir. Or at least, I attempted to. Given that I use VPNs, I got a cellphone text authentication prompt. But Mirimir doesn't have a cellphone, so I blew it off.
And here's the funny part. A few days later, Mirimir received email from LinkedIn, inviting him to join Mirimir's network on LinkedIn!