he contested them in court and was ultimately victorious, but it took 5 years (and presumably millions of pounds) to win that victory
to me that seems like a valid reason to be upset
he contested them in court and was ultimately victorious, but it took 5 years (and presumably millions of pounds) to win that victory
to me that seems like a valid reason to be upset
Mr Dyson's business has been systematically disadvantaged for years by corruption that seems to be endemic to the political institution that's membership is currently under debate
so why is it acceptable for the UK business establishment to campaign for what their believe to be in their best interests, but not for Mr Dyson to campaign for his?
It's not ok to say that Brexit will be great for all the other companies in the UK, whilst clearly demonstrating he couldn't care less. It's immoral. That's what I'm complaining about.
> Mr Dyson's business has been systematically disadvantaged for years by corruption that seems to be endemic to the political institution that's membership is currently under debate
You're going to have provide substantial evidence of that "corruption" vs Mr Dyson not get his own way and getting all upset.
did he say that though?
http://www.cityam.com/265756/james-dyson-car-makers-complain...
because it's not on that page
"Taxes or delays at the customs, it is not important compared to the manufacturing costs. Car manufacturers complain all the time. But there is no problem without [a] solution."
So he reckons it's all going to be unicorns and roses despite all warnings to the contrary. And you still haven't provided evidence of the much stronger allegation of EU corruption.
I'm done here