They are the current members of the Senate Judiciary Committee: http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/members.cfm
They don't really have anything else in common other than their committee membership.
They don't really have anything else in common other than their committee membership.
Then I think a much better headline would be "Senate Judiciary Committee Unanimously Votes In Favor Of Internet Censorship Bill" since the unanimous nature of the vote is the real story here.
Very strange that there were no dissenters. Anybody have a line into what sort of testimony the committee heard? Either an extremely persuasive case was made or there is some other part of this story that we are missing.
"Campaign Contributions" and access to a resort in the Bahamas.