Hacker News Reader

Comment by saagarjha | Hacker News Reader

> If you need an always-connected phone capable of making calls from the side of the road or wherever you happen to be, WiPhone is not that phone. However, if you're like most of us, 80% or more of your time is spent near accessable WiFi.

So this looks like a VoIP phone? I can't see myself using this, since I still need my phone to work the other 20% of the time…

View on HN

Yeah it’s pretty disappointing since an LTE module is cheaper than ever.

There's a big section on the page devoted to these points, but the main reason is this:

We aren't designing a phone, we're designing a device that allows hardware and low-level firmware hackers to do the things we want to do with phones, but can't due to being effectively locked out of modern smartphones.

That said, it should work perfectly fine as a home or office phone, or as a light-duty mobile one.

Longer reply here: http://a.wiphone.io/#but-i-need-my-gsmcdmalte

Not requiring a service subscription is one of the selling points. Additionally, there are no open-source cell basebands and they all allow your carrier to track you.

I see that, but I'm trying to find a use case for this that doesn't require people to carry a regular cell phone around anyways :/

They have a pretty good answer for this [1].

Basically, it's a black box component that introduces privacy risks and requires service plans.

[1] http://a.wiphone.io/#but-i-need-my-gsmcdmalte

I wonder if anyone is working on an open source baseband processor? I'm led to understand that existing parts are a mish-mash of documented protocols and "hacks" that are needed in practice to make it work, so I suppose it's a difficult task.

What is cheap? I see some modules on aliexpress for about us$20 but with very limited bands... And I wonder if patent fees are being for those.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com