But yeah, this stuff is good content but doesn't have much reach.
There is a pattern where highly specialized technical posts don't get as many comments, relative to votes. Possibly reverse engineering and other security-related specialties fall into this. One can see the same thing in e.g. articles about type theory: people are interested, but don't necessarily feel qualified to add to the discussion. That's probably good if it prevents the dumb sorts of comment from getting posted, but maybe the threads would be more valuable if more users would ask questions. Then the users who know could explain, and more learning would take place.
https://damng.github.io/hackernews-rss-with-inlined-content/...
Content will be made readable and inlined into the feed.
Anyway VC funding doesn't necessarily equate to being interesting.