> "Where does it end?"
It ends, as it always does (and must) with massive hypocrisy on the part of the arbitrary censor, since "harm" is so poorly defined that it ends up being replaced with "whatever seems fashionable today".
It ends, as it always does (and must) with massive hypocrisy on the part of the arbitrary censor, since "harm" is so poorly defined that it ends up being replaced with "whatever seems fashionable today".
You are defending literal nazis. Their idea of speech is Christchurch. Deplatforming that is absolutely the correct move.
This whole conversation centers on the relationship between speech and action. Equating the two will confuse the discussion.
Kicking them off Facebook isn't anywhere close to that large of a response.