> Were Section 230 to be eliminated the problems that Sen. Wyden mentions only get worse, because you either allow everything permissible under 1A or go out of business due to liability issues

It definitely means the end of the internet as we know it today; particularly, because of the collision of various lines of liability precedent (which motivated 230) it probably means the end of any American commercial entity hosting content from third parties free of charge, because even unmoderated unreviewed content will carry far higher risk of liability than today and moderated venues that don't feature deep and comprehensive review—and payment to cover the cost (and probably also indemnity clauses)—won't be viable at all: so instead of moderated public fora or unmoderated public fora you will have no public forum at all.