Citation needed. Free traders certainly hate the tariffs, but only a tiny fraction of the public are committed free traders. Also Democrats are dispositionally far more favorable to tariffs and protectionism than Republicans, so unless Trump doesn't run or the Libertarians win the presidency (ha!), I don't see the next administration being much of a swerve in the direction of free trade.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/California-wine...
I imagine the situation is similar for many other non-essential exports to China.
Second, both Democrats and Republicans leaderships are anti-China. Chuck Schumer, senate minority leader and a democrat, told trump to “hang tough” on the Chinese tariffs. Bernie Sanders slammed joe Biden when Biden made a remark about how China isn’t a threat.
The United States.
Which seemed to be the whole point of this exercise.
1.1 Structure of China's political economy system
1.2 Accusation of theft of intellectual property, technology and trade secrets
1.3 Forced technology transfer from US companies to Chinese entities
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93United_States_tr...
So you're cheerleading, of all places, Vietnam?
> 1.2 Accusation of theft of intellectual property, technology and trade secrets
Will still take place.
> 1.3 Forced technology transfer from US companies to Chinese entities
This only happens if you want to invest in China. It's a trade-off that's up to each individual firm doing it to make.
Also, I have a hard time believing that Trump's base give two shits about any of these things, beyond a bit of nationalistic ra-ra-ra. None of this has any impact on the life of someone pissed off that their best life prospects consist of collecting dole in the rust belt.
A bunch of mid-strength countries is better for the US than a superpower competitor.