Then the counter argument to that is that if enough people don't fly the airplane won't fly at all... But that would just make it commercially infeasible to operate many routes and in turn whole airlines and then we just have a complete deterioration of the airline industry.
Do people really care this little about the environment?
I don't get how my argument is like voting. If we all vote together then something positive happens (change). If we all 'vote' by not flying then the airline industry collapses - which is not positive. If I've miss-understood your example + argument please elaborate.
The solution here isn't black & white unlike in voting (you vote or you dont vote). Sure you can choose to fly or not fly, that's a "solution" but the better solution is to create more efficient airplanes that emit less CO2.
As a sidenote: traveling and seeing the world is what made me start caring about the environment. When you go snorkeling in Hawaii or climb Machu Picchu, you can't help but care about the environment.