> Do you have a list of said sites?
You are the one who claimed that all sites required to implement GDPR are privacy abusers. Do you have a list? In my country we adhere to the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" and we don't keep lists of innocent websites.
How do you automatically comply with a free-form letter sent via e-mail or, even worse, snail mail? You need one or more humans in the loop to identify these requests, even if it is just to send a canned response back.
You can have thousands of people send GDPR requests. Each person will take at least half an hour to print, compose, wrap and send letter. And someone at the company will take under a minute to reply to each one, because all they'd need to do is a quick scan of the letter, then send a pre-printed response.
The point of this site is that there is no composition. Just print, address, and send if you want to snail mail. If that takes you half an hour, I don't know what to tell you.
> And someone at the company will take under a minute to reply to each one, because all they'd need to do is a quick scan of the letter, then send a pre-printed response.
Under a minute to 1) identify the letter and the sender; 2) pull the correct pre-printed response; 3) address and send the response? How does your hypothetical employee do this so much faster than your hypothetical private citizen?
Not all websites are ran by huge companies. Actually, most are not.