You must not have searched very thoroughly. Here’s the first article that came up when I searched “David Farber net neutrality”: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/531671/are-we-really-savi...
> it could have meant something different at that time
Nope. It meant basically the same thing it does today.
> It is unsurprising that investors like Andreessen are opposed to net neutrality: they stand to get richer without it.
The firms and investors backing NN also stand to benefit from it, so this ad hominem is moot.