Data-plans on offer: https://www.jio.com/en-in/4g-plans
And they manage to remain profitable (only-telco in India that reported profit this quarter) : https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/relian...
Data-plans on offer: https://www.jio.com/en-in/4g-plans
And they manage to remain profitable (only-telco in India that reported profit this quarter) : https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/relian...
Investing in them is a play on interest rates more than anything.
Lots of télécoms came out like bandits by selling their infrastructure at very high valuations.
Looking at the lastest financials report: https://s22.q4cdn.com/758587962/files/doc_financials/quarter...
They are reporting a leverage ratio of ~7. My initial hot-take: That's a leverage multiple; not a ratio. Yet reading their formula they are reporting that 7 as DEBT / PRE-DEPRECATION-PROFIT. Thus such a formula is not an LTV but rather a formula one might use if one acknowledged the underlying assets only had cashflow value.
Using an LTV formula they look more reasonable at 0.7LTV. Which indeed is high, about half the equity common to the REITs I've looked at. Yet with a 10% return on invested capital it does not seem the infrastructure was overvalued.
Now this is not an area I know much about so I'm mostly hoping you can show me where I'm wrong and thus I can learn more.
Many high debt companies that had their equity almost wiped out ended up with 10x the equity if they could pay their bills again.
In Poland I pay ~ 13.30 USD for 12 GB per month (with additional 12 GB on top of that for 1 year) + unlimited calls/sms/mms. And my plan is pretty crappy in comparison to currently available ones.
That's per year, not month!
Third party (or wholy owned subsidiaries) MVNOs are often less expensive as well.
EDIT: English sentence structure