> If a proposal is boosted, the total voting token supply doesn’t matter at all, only the tokens involved in the vote are counted. That is, if merely three tokens out of a total supply of 1000 were involved in the vote, and two support the proposal—66% support—that’s enough to approve the proposal! So, stakers are not only betting on which proposals will eventually be supported and signaling voters towards them, but they are actually catalyzing the decision making process dramatically.

TLDR, a small amount of voters can basically hijack quorums by throwing tokens at the problem.

Also, what is with these "decentralized networks" which seem to have amazing amounts of money to throw at vaguely described problems, but can't seem to actually indicate where their money comes from or how they intend to profit? Aragon is yet another "we'll give you large sums of money if you use our platform" without clearly indicating the why or how of where the money comes from, and how they intend to profit.