At least to me, "f*g over someone" would imply malicious intent - these economic agents are neither benevolent nor malicious - they simply don't care. In a slightly wider context, this is exactly why an AGI is considered dangerous.
At least to me, "f*g over someone" would imply malicious intent - these economic agents are neither benevolent nor malicious - they simply don't care. In a slightly wider context, this is exactly why an AGI is considered dangerous.
In fact mainstream neoliberal economic theory has always been about rationalising political actions that operate against the interests of most of the population.
The origination and promotion of these economic myths is calculated, deliberate, and absolutely malicious in intent. The Chicago School didn't just happen - it was created, promoted, funded and nurtured as a dogmatic political movement opposed to Keynesianism.
Individual actors may not care, but that's exactly the problem -they've been incentivised not to.
Under a more humane system, they could just as easily be incentivised towards other actions.