Disrespectful - these complicated issues involve people who have been and continue to be disadvantaged by these issues, your flippancy is disrespectful.
The only explanation there is that I'm talking about "issues involve people who have been and continue to be disadvantaged"
Those rich folks have been "disadvantaged" by being deprived of things they have claims on. Obviously they are already quite advantaged, but you can't deny they have less advantage without the things they're claiming.
So, it only matters that one group has fewer resources therefore they have a moral advantage?
I think you are being flippant and disrespectful by calling me names instead of providing substantial counterpoints.
Yet at the same time, you can't see how you have been "flippant" and "disrespectful" to the complicated issues (with real people who are affected by this) you pulled together in your 2 paragraph comment.
Ignoring all detail when there have been 10000s of academic books written trying to explain and understand these issues from all viewpoints.