It wouldn’t be much like rum unless it were brewed with dark sugar.
Ethanol itself is most of the calories in any alcoholic drink.
A 12 oz can of 5% abv is .6 fluid ounces of ethanol. That's 14 grams, or 98 calories.
A Budweiser has 145 calories, White Claw has 100, Old Chub Scottish ale has 264.
Basically I see the benefit over most craft beer, but over macros it's not that big of a difference.
https://drinks.seriouseats.com/2013/10/cocktail-science-do-a...
https://www.quora.com/Do-calories-in-alcohol-really-exist-If...
I cant find an exact answer, but combining the ideas that: the metabolic pathways for ethanol take precedence over the metabolism of other food components, leading to fat conversion and storage of higher-kcal foods than would be expected if the energy for metabolism was not diverted to the alcohol; the extra energy needed to metabolize alcohol should become a net drain on energy reserves; and alcohol is almost never fully metabolized, but rather excreted as acetic acid - I think it is safe to assume that an ethanol calorie actually provides the body very little energy AND if youre not eating while you are drinking there isnt a way for the body to store the energy as fat for later.
The bigger difference between White Claw and rum, i would say, is that rum is distilled, whereas White Claw is only fermented. I'm not sure there are any traditional non-distilled drinks made from sugar, and Wikipedia is down so i basically have no way to fake being well-informed as i usually do.
One thing that seems to be often overlooked is that yeast do not simply convert sugar into ethanol. They require nutrients and will produce different compounds(Google tryptophol) if a nutrient runs out and prevents complete metabolism.