As usual, lots of downvotes, but no one is physically capable of posting an excerpt of actual substantial, detailed, purely fact-based evidence, but rather only narrative based conspiratorial stories and speculation built on top of some relatively minor facts, that relies heavily on the human mind's ability to invisibly fill in the gaps with "common sense" (aka heuristics) where actual factual information is missing.

Reminds me once again of the recent HN article:

Most of the Mind Can’t Tell Fact from Fiction

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20976567

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20977196

"Which computer system did they break into"

From the NYTimes article:

While details of many of the hackings directed by Russian intelligence, particularly in Illinois and Arizona, are well known,

Probably the most relevant part:

>It concluded that while there was no evidence that any votes were changed in actual voting machines, “Russian cyberactors were in a position to delete or change voter data” in the Illinois voter database. The committee found no evidence that they did so.