> China does not have freedom of speech but in a way neither does the US.
A radical and undefended claim. In what way is this true? You never say.
> did edward snowden have freedom?
Yes he did. Then he broke the law and ran away from the consequences of his actions.
> It's just another regime.
A single-party regime with no term limits on executive power is a stark contrast with a representative democratic federation designed with a multitude of checks and balances on its own power structures.
> you still have to use the products that China made for you because you as a country do not have the technical ability to manufacture the same products
False choice between Chinese products & domestic. No reasonable person believes that China is the sole manufacturing presence on Earth. There are a multitude of other options. China, however, does need the US -- the largest free market on the planet.
> Just like how the slaughter of millions of people by the nuclear bomb dropped on hiroshima by the united states does not define the united states as a country, neither do the protests of hong kong define China.
Those two things are indeed important, defining characteristics of the two countries you describe. One of them was an act of world war decades ago. The other is current events, the result of an illegal act of oppression by a dystopian communist state, heavily indicative of what China is today.