Hacker News Reader

I'm mainly asking the question because the article implies[1] that they're mainly archiving Trump stuff, not in general archiving misinformation.

[1] yes, I know it doesn't say it outright, but I don't think it's a stretch to get the gist.

View on HN

So you're criticising the article for making an argument that you realise is happening entirely in your head?

Articles can be written in such a way as to imply meaning that's not specifically stated, and this is one example.

From the article: """ Separately, as part of the effort to document the 45th president’s often-contradictory statements, the organisation is cataloguing Mr Trump’s tweets. """

I would say not entirely in his own head.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com