How about an archive (outside the EU) of every Right To Be Forgotten request, and links to what was not to be remembered.
The people of the EU can be the most forgetful people on the planet. But everyone else can remember.
However, it is impolite to point and laugh. So don't. Keep it to a low snicker.
For example, in Germany, people have a right to anonymity, that forbids newspapers to identify persons (print full names, photos, addresses) unless making them public would be in the public interest. While this isn't perfect and of course open to interpretation, it seems to me that having privacy protections (and due process where they fail) is much better lawmaking than trying the fix things down the road when the privacy is already breached. Especially if the fixes are this ham-fisted.
My understanding is the Right to Be Forgotten predates GDPR by a fairly long period.
> The Lumen database collects and analyzes legal complaints and requests for removal of online materials, helping Internet users to know their rights and understand the law. These data enable us to study the prevalence of legal threats and let Internet users see the source of content removals.
You can search it for references to the right to be forgotten[1], although the results will not contain full URLs of the removal requests.
[0]: https://www.lumendatabase.org/
[1]: https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&...
Google AMP will cache (store?) outside of the EU all pages using that service, and the Internet Archive might store pages before any deletion request, but they're not subject to EU laws. What a mess....
edit: I welcome any move directed at protecting people privacy, but this seems clearly made by people who don't have a clue about the involved technical problems and would attempt to solve every issue by ordering to block traffic to or from some places (when the only tool you know is a hammer...).