https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intention...
Apparently, Congo is in the 50 most violent countries. That's also recent. It has no accounting for what they were, but I'm willing to believe it may have been worse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statist...
> Apparently, Congo is in the 50 most violent countries. That's also recent. It has no accounting for what they were, but I'm willing to believe it may have been worse.
Unless we have data that hails from the 1800's regarding pre-Belgium rates, which I'd say is pretty damn unlikely, I don't see how you can possibly make this point. It just sounds like good old fashioned racism with the window trimmings of science and data stripped of any and all context, which is a pretty standard fare tactic for a racist. "The crime rates are so high in Detroit, must be all the blacks!" Can't possibly be the catastrophic recession or the lukewarm response by the Government to address the problems, no, black people are just naturally violent. That's why we had to kill them and put them in chains.
https://www.verywellmind.com/are-personality-traits-caused-b...
Genetics is suddenly very unpopular as it can predict negative traits. Imagine that.
This happens when you have societies that do not adequately punish violence. Societies that reward violence will most certainly produce more violence.
In my background in the south, people want to justify their racism so they just say "I'm not racist, I am just making observations of people's behavior". That's just an excuse for being racist.