I have worked with (and interviewed) A LOT of devs with 10-15 years of experience who can't do a basic fizz-buzz (I'm exaggerating, of course, but really, really weak devs who due to whatever reason didn't bother to improve their skills past what they learned in school in 1980s).
Even $60,000 can be acceptable for a dev with "15 years of experience", if his skills are worth $60,000.
People tend to collect toys like diplomas, certificates, etc... I'd probably be downvoted, but imo correlation between actual skills and those toys is getting weaker lately.
edit: I guess you're more so comparing people with degrees vs. those without so my response would better fit under the parent comment. basically all I'm saying is yes, 10 years experience does mean something in this field, but if your interview style isn't picking up on that then your interview process is broken.