I get good service in restaurants because it's their job, but I can tip 0-10% if the service is beyond what I expect.
The important thing isn't that the pay is guaranteed for staff that doesn't provide good service, what's important is that their pay is guaranteed even if there are no customers. Bringing in customers isn't the job of waiting staff (apart from providing good service) - so their pay should never depend on it.
That is not true. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratuity
All else being equal you will get better service from a person that is directly rewarded by offering that better service. Should it work that way? No. Does it? Obviously. And yes we can all think of outliers and yes some culturing differences play into this (Japan has a no tipping culture and on average has excellent service) but I live in Amsterdam and the service on average is absolutely less customer focused here than what I experience in the US. It's worth pointing out I also prefer it that way (not a huge fan of constantly being asked if I need anything and less than genuine niceties but that's a subjective thing)
You technically have to be compensated up to regular minimum wage if tips don't make it but that's a great way to get your hours reduced due to "scheduling changes"
I don't mean this in a bad way, but are you american? It does seem a very US viewpoint that goodwill etc. don't really exist (or matter? something else?), and that people need concrete incentives to treat others decently.
Sure money's an motivator but perhaps a bigger one is to have a client treat you with decency. Sure money helps but to have a client just make you feel OK instead of crap, that would matter a lot more to most people. A big tip wouldn't negate bad attitude, even if it got staff to pretend to give a damn about you.
Happened to read this yesterday, not tasteful but relevant <https://theoatmeal.com/comics/tipping_tooting>
Edit: To be clear, in my experience I don’t find the service of an average U.S. waiter/waitress better than that of an average waiter/waitress in a country without a tipping culture.
They do this because they were instructed by their manager to do this. And the reason that managers want it done, is because they want the customers to finish their food and quickly vacate the table, freeing it up for the next customers. Of course they won’t tell you outright to leave, but they think they can psychologically obtain the same effect just by bugging you and making it hard for you and your fellow diner(s) to have a peaceful, leisurely conversation.
This can happen in Europe, too. At a couple of cafes in my town, as soon as you drink the last drop in your glass, the waitress will rush over and ask if you would like to order anything else. Owners do not like customers who occupy a table for a long time on just one single purchase.
Ah yes, now that you bring it up, I’m definitely not a fan of that either.
Another way tipping can add toxicity is when a guest isn’t aware of the tipping culture / not sure how much to tip, ends up not tipping or undertipping, and in those cases sometimes you’d notice nasty looks or other forms of visible grumpiness. (Checks don’t always include recommended tip amounts.)
That said, I flipped on this recently. The above utopian perspective simply doesn't align with reality anymore. Higher tips simply do result in on average better service (be it genuine or otherwise) and do incentivise waiters to work for the customer rather than their employer. The latter has value too. Which waiter do you want in a case where the owner of a dodgy establishment is asking their waiters to push the fish that's about to go bad? A waiter living off of tips from (return) customers or the one that just gets wage from that employer?