Sorry, what? I haven't seen a shred of marketing material aiming the new Mac Pro at programmers. Everything about it - including every piece of software shown onscreen in a render - screams Hollywood, which by the author's own admission, "wouldn't bat an eyelid at paying high 5 figure sums for hardware".
> even the 1.5TBs a maxed out Mac Pro can handle
The max is currently 4.0TB, with an 8.0TB option on the way. Not sure where 1.5 came from.
The value proposition on the baseline model is definitely weird, especially how it compares to Apple's own iMac, but I think it's an extreme case for a machine that's really intended to be specced-up. And most of the article was spent laying out, in detail, just how bad of a deal that anomalous configuration is, instead of discussing the more realistic ones.