Contraceptive abortion, especially late term ones. Consider how unusual and horrifying the villain in Cell Block 99 is. Also consider the consider the cognitive dissonance between current abortion laws and the legal consequences for assault resulting in a failed pregnancy.
EDIT: "Contraceptive" is probably more precise than "prophylactic"
Besides, frequency of an event isn't a defense against charges of barbarism. Lobotomies, the Tuskegee Experiment, and eugenic sterilization weren't all that common, but they were barbaric.
If we are being honest, open heart surgery is barbaric. They cut people open and then break all their ribs.
It's not assault or murder, for a variety of reasons that I'm not going to go into.
Further, experience tells me that granting good faith in these arguments is usually a bad idea. I oppose the right-wing on every issue. Abortion is particularly important in this context because it normalizes state based oppression against women.
So the poster shouldn't have an opinion?
"Further, experience tells me that granting good faith in these arguments is usually a bad idea."
Isn't granting good faith to others' arguments one of the cherished ideals on HN?
People have been using free speech absolutism over the last couple of years to popularize poisonous ideas. Should we keep letting that happen?
EDIT: Maybe they have an opinion, but frankly that lot don't spin this as an opinion. It's barbarism. It's murder. It's evil. Don't act like their isn't a larger context to all of this.
I understand the desire to group that opinion along with PizzaGate or some other toxic nonsense. That's exactly the sort of cognitive dissonance I'm talking about.
I am actually sympathetic to and support single mothers in all sorts of ways, not that people should have to qualify philosophical opinions with virtue signalling.
https://www.humanesociety.org/resources/pets-numbers
It's very sad but legal.
Yes. All of them.
I've never had to do so with a flat-earther simply because I've never met one.
But the others? Sure, I treat them like human beings.
Marginalizing people for their beliefs will not change their minds but it WILL fracture society. I think some people will side with the "opposing view" simply because they are indignant when they see how the sanctimonious mob treats them.
Somehow I'm being sanctimonious because I'm not going to pretend that there is no historical context to all of this.
That's what they have been doing this whole time. The far-right pushes against the bounds of decency and then the center-right says that you aren't being civil when someone brings it up.
I'm not marginalizing anyone. I'm just not going to pretend that there is no larger context.