Your circular references to transparency reports from the very same companies petitioning for a pass isn't convincing. CNN literally settled in court, not 8 hours ago for defamation against kids [8], whose politics they despise, despite no wrongdoing on part of the kids. These companies aren't neutral third parties, nor are they benign. They have their agendas - shaped by the powerful at their helm, who quite literally cried because an opposition party came to power [9]
As for Indian TV's criticism of the ruling party, I'm told that there is a healthy and powerful political opposition party, replete with a sympathetic media faction that openly takes their side (as are channels aligned with the ruling party), and Twitter seems to be teeming with criticisms of the establishment. India's press is generally considered free, and freedom of expression rankings are also generally high, apart from the hate-speech laws implemented by the previous administration?
[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX6LlEcJ4nw
[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzF7nBmwPso
[3]: https://youtu.be/DXyU0LOqKPM?t=5111
[4]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ik_kzn3etsE
[5]: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/30/twitter-bans-political-ads-a...
[6]: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politic...
[7]: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obama-digital-...
[8]: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/01/07/nick-s...