Anyway, I switched languages and I'm "zed0134" on their network. The whole thing struck me as a bit odd.
Anyway, I switched languages and I'm "zed0134" on their network. The whole thing struck me as a bit odd.
curl -d '{"onlineId":"zeta0134","reserveIfAvailable":true}' \
-X POST https://accounts.api.playstation.com/api/v1/accounts/onlineIds \
-H "Content-Type: application/json"
And got a response indicating that the name was both valid (i.e. not "improper") and available. Maybe at one particular time the word was flagged, but I can't imagine why.edit: As other repliers have said, I did think that it could have something to do with Los Zetas, and maybe that was the case in the past. However, as of now, `zeta0134`, `zetas0134`, and `loszetas0134` are all valid and available names, according to the endpoint.
Interestingly, `pabloescobar0134` is considered improper. However, `elchapo0134` is not – which supports the argument that Sony's blacklist is (obviously) manually curated and perhaps subject to change. Maybe enough people who wanted "Zeta" complained for Sony to realize it was a word that had many more uses than in Los Zetas
I don't know Mitch Hedberg, but that's also my reasoning. I'm not superstitious, but if I were and I had a problem with number 13, I totally wouldn't want to sit on row "14". There is a supernatural power that makes 13 bad and you can fool it by printing a "14" on top of what's clearly the 13th row? The spirit, deity or force of nature that causes bad luck looks at the labels? Come on!
I imagine the way you're approaching this is not unrelated to the fact that you're not superstitious. That is to say, if you were superstitious, it's possible you wouldn't feel this way about the fake 14th row. Not having to see and think about the number 13 may be enough.
? Seems like a poor reason but most profanity filters are inconsistent as hell anyway so its possible.
Maybe it's that.
I can explain that one to you.