Nope. Its darwinian, the more modules in the gene pool means newer/better solutions need to fight harder to survive & win. So the outcome is often better for Perl/CPAN, for eg. Moose
I think you're correct, but that there are trade-offs. Take Python, for example. They have "batteries included", and when modules make it into the std lib, they pretty much stop evolving. However, on the up-side, Python gains users who like having everything packaged up nice and neat so they don't need to go looking for modules quite as much.
Perl takes the popularity hit of not having too many batteries included, but benefits from the darwinian element that works to make the 3rd-party modules better. So, perlers need to spend more time asking around (or checking cpanratings), and also dealing with it when there's turnover (the module that they chose a few years ago is eclipsed by a competitor, or stops being maintained, and now they need to rewrite some of their code).
In the end, I think Perl has better modules.
BTW... I believe all language repos will have darwinism acting upon it. I see it in Ruby & Python as well as on CPAN. Its Perl philosophy and CPAN size that just stirs the pot a bit more!
My statements about darwinism and also about Moose being better for Perl/CPAN are factually correct.
Darwinism has nothing to do with this. At best you're trying to invent a connection that doesn't exist.
Based on your comments here and the fact you're a newly created account then I am going to have to make the assumption that trolls do indeed exist among us :(
Of course not, that is just an assumption of yours ;-)
Seriously though I do feel your comments have had a troll tone and my previous statement was half in jest. So I do apologise sincerely if you have taken offence to it.
So again sorry and welcome aboard HN.