So, you're implicitly suggesting that unless I accept a user agreement of one of the dirtiest companies in business I should not be a part of society?
I'm really rather glad that we quite obviously don't inhibit the same world.
I'm really rather glad that we quite obviously don't inhibit the same world.
To be clear here, I tried to do this, and all it earned me was ostracism. It is not a virtuous act at all, despite what some may like to give you the impression of.
In Finland, Internet access is considered to be a human right, and it's not feasible to do a lot of things otherwise, such as banking errands. Considering Facebook == the Internet to many people, I don't see why the same rules can't apply there.
Can Facebook be voted into a law where it is considered to be a human right? It's possible, but before that ever happens chases are much bigger that scientology becomes official religion and everyone will mutate to look like Moomins.
You're moving the discussion from
"You must sign on to Facebook to participate in society" to
"[In Finland] internet usage is considered a human right"
By essentially changing your argument and implying something which I never said and which has nothing to do with what I said you invalidate your argument.
And that "neat trick" (which is pretty transparent, alas) makes you intellectually dishonest.
I think we can close the discussion here. Thanks for playing.