Hacker News Reader

Comment by threeseed | Hacker News Reader

So what if they cost $550 ?

The target audience are companies and professionals who have no qualms dropping $40k on a workstation.

Its not objectively wrong. If Apple can sell their product at this price that's great for Apple. It feels wrong because Apple position themselves as a manufacturer of high-end-but-worth-the-price goods where you aren't just spending money on a logo. That produces a strange dissonance here because it's impossible to imagine how 4 casters could be worth about $137.50 each, and that's compounded by the fact they're worse than $5 casters that lock in place.

I feel like market research has gotten significantly better, but a blinkered focus on it is destroying brands. It may be a fairly predictable pattern that the most lucrative customers are the worst people, the most gullible, badge obsessed stereotypes who just want to show off. And a brand might not have been defined by them completely, but once it starts having that association, and the data shows that is where the most money can be made, nobody can maintain any other vision for the brand. It's kind of like the classic dilemma of a company facing disruptive innovation, where they can't respond even when everyone can see what's coming.

The answer is it doesn't matter what they're worth or how much it costs because people are free to make their own decisions

What was the question ?

"I don't remember the question, but I know the answer."

The real question is what has Apple done to prevent people from using a $10 set of four plain black nylon casters instead of the $550 official casters with the brushed aluminum "Apple look"--that are still missing a very basic feature of a $20 set of furniture casters.

Even the fancy ball casters with faux-antique bronze finish and soft rubber treads are only about $12 each. A heavy-duty top-plate caster, with solid nylon wheel and dual ball bearings, and brake--all the bells, and all the whistles--might run $30 each.

It's so audaciously greedy that it's insulting to people who wouldn't even consider buying it.

You could even put your Mac in a top-of-the-line toddler stroller for $300, and that would be forward compatible with your next crazily-pampered desktop computer.

I wonder if Apple would void your warranty if you use those and they find out.

In the US, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act prevents exactly that (unless the reason for the warranty claim is caused specifically by the aftermarket part).

https://www.sema.org/sema-enews/2011/01/ftc-validates-right-...

I wonder if Apple just doesn’t want to bother producing those wheels?

Because I, a potential consumer of Apple's other products, shouldn't have to think about whether I fall into this strange grey-area where it is apparently ok to be gouged.

Plus a lot of them are architects, with perfectly level concrete floors.

Architects != concrete workers. And most concrete floors have a slight slope to make draining water simple.

Is that true indoors not in a shower?

IIRC, it's true on the floor of the Pantheon, which is stone (atop what I think is roman concrete). The floor slopes towards a point below the oculus, where a drain in the floor has been placed to get rid of rainwater. That said, I doubt anyone will be parking a new Mac Pro there anytime soon.

Sorry, missed this initially. It's not a code requirement. However, it makes cleaning concrete floors dead simple (hose + squeegee), so it's incredibly common in rental spaces where the finished floor is sealed concrete.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com