> potential dangerous
that is ridiculous. How is he dangerous?
that is ridiculous. How is he dangerous?
We're talking about whether he has to sit in a bulletproof box, or next to his lawyers like any other accused person. Your argument against this is that he's "dangerous" because he released unredacted documents (a disputed version of events, by the way). I don't follow the logic here, can you explain?
This claim has been refuted (by the US gov).