Hacker News Reader

Comment by numpad0 | Hacker News Reader

Both side's on it. In fact there's no sides. Just that Twitter is competent at removing constructive elements and distilling hatred/rage/anger for profit and it's working against you.

There are few ways to strip out some of their 10-year "improvement" and oh how deserted it looks under there...

View on HN

Message to the shareholders: "Millions of active users, billions of messages"

The truth: most of those messages are angry and argumentative, and most of those "active users" are just the same people being angry and tribal towards each other.

It makes for good stats, but like all stats, they're just numbers if presented without the context and analysis behind them.

It makes for good stats and it makes revenues. For those angered victims they would express sympathy if that's what you are going to ask for I guess...? My fear is this is going to destroy the society in a decade or two but then not many company survive that long so in financial risktaking standpoint this can't be significant.

I don't have any numbers to back this up, but I'm quite convinced certain subcultures are overrepresented on Twitter, and that while Twitter is open to all, that doesn't mean it's a representative cross-section of the general population.

I think this is true of most social networks, and is more obvious in certain cases, e.g., Tumblr.

The internet attracts people who are marginalized in meatspace. Queer people and neonazis are both marginalized.

It's pretty notable on the left - for example, tankies, who are almost nonexistant irl, flood that website.

Both sides are indeed on Ttwitter but it feels like it has a strong skew to the left. And as Time Pool discussed on Joe Rogan, the platform itself censors right wing opinion far more than left wing opinion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbTXqrS9l5E

There are more than two sides.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com