I think you’re over constraining the solution. Why does the solution need to benefit the manufacturer? Coca Cola is a corporation with no feelings. The environment is a real living entity. If the costs of the corporation go up but the environment benefits this seems like a win. The corporation will balance out operations whatever costs are unless the restrictions are so onerous it can no longer operate, and I don’t think that’s the case. If anything the cost of soda would rise, which some places are already doing for public benefit through consumption taxes. If people drink less soda because the cost is slightly higher, that wouldn’t really be a negative outcome.