Cambodia's extremely low case count can easily be explained away by them not testing anyone, but Vietnam appears to be quite proactive with tracing and testing, yet still has a relatively low count and minimal transmission.
Cambodia's extremely low case count can easily be explained away by them not testing anyone, but Vietnam appears to be quite proactive with tracing and testing, yet still has a relatively low count and minimal transmission.
They are testing as much as they can, everybody who had contact with infected people are tracked down and quarantined, streets where you had infected people are closed down and disinfected, almost everybody wear masks, you have temperature checks & hydroalcoholic gel available in public areas, schools are fully closed since early January.
If Vietnam had the transmission going on that Italy does, the case-tracking and quarantining would be a lot harder, and I just don't buy that the other things (masks, forehead temperature checks[0], hand sanitizer that hardly anyone knows how to use properly) have much of an impact.
There has to be some much larger factor than those at play (and this study suggests what that factor could be).
[0] I encourage people to ask or look what the reading is when getting these checks. About a third of the time when I get a forehead temperature check, the reading is totally nonsensical, like 31C, but the person just waves me through since it's under the threshold. I'm skeptical of the efficacy of a test that is this inaccurate.
The abstract states that high temperature and high humidity reduce transmission rates relative to colder climates, which corresponds with the high transmission rates during the northern hemisphere winter and early spring.
And yes, lack of testing has resulted in some eyebrow raising numbers.
Up in Da Nang now, both locals and foreigners are aware and taking it seriously -- scary times.