Hacker News Reader

Comment by justanotherc | Hacker News Reader

But they don't have civil forfeiture, they have a less tyrannical justice system, they have fewer incarcerated people per capita, so there's that.

Americans claim they are free, but only if they contort the definition. There's more to freedom than guns and free speech.

View on HN

A more tyrannical justice system and more incarcerated people are not necessarily bad per se. Remember that the US is vastly more heterogeneous which translates into more crime. Keeping criminals in prison is freedom--freedom to own a store and not being robbed, for instance.

Not sure how common civil forfeiture is, I'm not American, but it sounds quite fishy indeed. As I said below, I didn't mention the US at all...

> Keeping criminals in prison is freedom--freedom to own a store and not being robbed, for instance.

I think when people mention the high incarceration rate in the U.S., they're usually bemoaning not the armed robbers, but those that are incarcerated for three-strikes laws, recreational drug use, non-violent recidivism, and those unconvicted but unable to afford bail.

You really think that the freedom to organize a neonazi cell is more important than the freedom not to be robbed at gun point by the police?

I'm not sure that incarceration (and the circumstances under which it usually happens) in the US is increasing the "freedom". See i.e. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wtV5ev6813I

Its a fair point, I'm just pointing out the fact that freedom is in the eye of the collective beholder.

> Remember that the US is vastly more heterogeneous which translates into more crime

Care to substantiate that claim?

Care to debunk it?

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence or in your case, any. It's on you to prove it not vise versa.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/43552152?seq=1

and

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227283604_Populatio...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com