> I don't mean to be negative but this is another useless nutrition paper. It shows effects we already know about

So I'm going to put you in the "nay" camp regarding the importance of reproducibility[0] in science? Kind of funny that half the time nutritional science gets criticized because it isn't reproduced/reproducible enough and the other half because it is "useless" to reproduce the same findings. Cannot win.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility#Reproducible_r...