> A big part of what happened in Zimbabwe, by the way, was that land reforms caused a massive collapse in food production (a major part of their economy) and unemployment skyrocketed. They spent a lot in response

Okay.

Fed officials are predicting 30% unemployment, and we're seeing a massive collapse in goods and services production (not food, but it may as well be in a 70% services based economy) as cities go into lockdown. To respond to this, we intend to spend a lot.

I'm a bit confused as to how the current situation doesn't mirror, nearly perfectly, the Zimbabwe example. We are literally printing and spending into a severe supply (yes, services follow supply curves just as much as goods do) and unemployment shock.