Hacker News Reader

Why must you twist everything to make victims where you are the theoretical aggressor while comparing your desired outcome against what could conceivably happen should your proposed solutions be ignored? Is this a trick of some sort? A legalese technique? I am legitimately confused.

View on HN

I dunno, I genuinely care about the well-being of people who make a living by writing books. Maybe that's weird and confusing?

I don’t see them twisting anything. Their arguments are the most basic standard knowledge on the economics of IP, and you just continue to refuse engaging with them with anything but superficial slogans.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com