> AI does not mean ML
Hence the 'or' in my statement. Neither are present here.
Hence the 'or' in my statement. Neither are present here.
This does exactly that.
I would say that the more a program thinks on its own which actions to take to maximize its chances of success, the closer to AI it is.
If it's doing exactly what it's explicitly told, then it's not really intelligent, is it?
>Every program that has ever existed does this.
No, not every program is self-tuning, nor do they all take inputs.