She gave me one-sentence feedback. Why should I lie? what will I gain? I wanted to share my experience. That's it.
I got all the unit test passing for all their algorithm questions. I didn't bomb the interview. Maybe we have different definitions.
I got all the unit test passing for all their algorithm questions. I didn't bomb the interview. Maybe we have different definitions.
[..] They had no clue how to calculate time complexity. No clue why provided unit tests were not enough and etc. [..]
This part makes the impression that you lack the pracmatic understanding of real world-coding. Testing to much, focusing on unimportant things, building to big and wasting to much time for worthless things.
In coding there are usually two type of people: tinkerer who get things done fast and dirty, and academics who slowly build shiny ivory-towers. Both have their legit space, but not every job fits both of them equal good.
I really doubt the veracity of your claim, but even taking your complains at face value I have to say the rationale you are trying to gather your complains make no sense at all.
I mean, do you honestly believe you are able to adequately justify your case by quoting a single sentence provided by a recruiter (who, mind you, is not he one interviewing you) who happened to be the one talking with you over the phone?
And again unit tests are completely irrelevant to the issue. If you made it to the last interview round of a FAANG then you already passed their tech screening. The last interview of a FAANG hiring round typically focuses on your personality and soft skills, which clearly from the way you chose to present yourself in this thread is something you are really struggling with.