Google isn't taking control of DNS. That will still be up to the user, and like Firefox, I expect it to be configurable too. Mozilla already implemented and is using DNS-over-HTTPS. That is why I find the Google hate to be semi-manufactured. Cases like this, it makes no sense to argue against something like this. Even if I was running my own DNS server, I would still want to use DNS-over-HTTPS in my own setup.

I'm all for decentralizing DNS and the web as a whole, but does that mean that I am going to advocate against better centralized security because of it? Absolutely not, especially when a majority of users don't have access to decentralized DNS today.