Ah, RationalWiki. At least it makes Wikipedia look consistently fair and unbiased, I suppose. (Two thirds of that page read to me like "and this is why Hanson should be unpersoned")
Imagine an article on Obama's presidency that devoted a paragraph to his accomplishments, and then several pages to drone strikes on US citizens, use of torture, selling guns to Mexican drug lords, and keeping kids in cages. None of it's wrong, but it's really not a fair assessment.