Every conservative who use those services will tell you, they're biased.
They've been putting their thumb on the scale for many years, now the chickens have come home to roost.
Downvote me to oblivion, I don't care, tonight I'm happy.
Every conservative who use those services will tell you, they're biased.
They've been putting their thumb on the scale for many years, now the chickens have come home to roost.
Downvote me to oblivion, I don't care, tonight I'm happy.
2. You think you will be downvoted here, is it due to humans with differing views or this website’s management’s bias, and what does that mean for your point?
3. Do you not know that conservative talking heads and influencers go wildly viral every hour of every day on all 3 of these networks, reaching audiences far outside their conservative following?
2. It's simple, liberals are more prone to downvote and censor than conservatives.
3. They reach their followers, Twitter, FB and Google reach everybody.
2. No I am asking do you think people are downvoting you or do you think this website is penalizing you for saying conservative leaning things?
3. Where do you think conservative influencers get their new followers? If they play the game right (posting engaging content that people would want to share) their content goes viral and they get huge algorithmic discovery from new audiences.
It’s why you upload a video you want to get lots of views to YouTube instead of Vimeo, the discovery engine helps you get a bigger audience.
But it doesn’t mean you are silenced if you upload to Vimeo or even your own website, it just means that you aren’t playing YouTube’s game and as a result won’t get YouTube’s completely free search, related and social traffic boosts.
2. Yes, I think this website (the users who react to the more political posts at least) penalize conservative views. It's not unique to HN of course, if anything it's better than the rest, but it's pretty obvious yes.
3. You compare some personalities that only reach those who are interested in what they have to say with big corps that are unavoidable on the internet and that editorialize every piece of information we're getting, from our news, the video we watch etc.
The way this will go is: Twitter sues, judge almost certainly issues an injunction, Trump administration appeals, and we go from there.
And it's working, perhaps a third of the population believe this, and another third is losing it's trust in the entire system.
He doesn't need total support, just enough steadfast support while keeping the opposition dazed and confused.