Hacker News Reader

Personally I dont give a fuck what the indigenous people want or have done.

I want those historical sites preserved.

No mining company or contract is going to sway that opinion.

But they are historical due to the aboriginal inhabitants of that land at that time.

How are the owners of that land who are aboriginal not have a right to allow the removal of such places if agreed?

Same way if you own a terrace house in downtown Sydney youre only allowed to do certain things to maintain the historic nature of the buildings.

Same way we say you cant dump chemical waste on land you own just because you own it.

We place restrictions on usage rights all the damn time.

Were you upset about this before the article?