Perhaps the issue Good Governance vs Bad Governance would be effective/useful? (as opposed to the current axis of big vs small)
As was said by Deng Xiapong "it doesn't matter if the cat is white or black.."
Perhaps the issue Good Governance vs Bad Governance would be effective/useful? (as opposed to the current axis of big vs small)
As was said by Deng Xiapong "it doesn't matter if the cat is white or black.."
It's harder to have 'good government' when there are more ways for it to fail.
I'm not so delusional to think that there will be some magical shrinking of the government, but you seem to be telling me that it isn't a worthy goal, which I disagree with. You can have the goal of making the government work now while at the same time trying to trim away the useless pieces.
The debate about big vs small govt. is one of many, pointless hand-wavy, ideas used to harm your debate.
Is it wrong to point out that something is being used to obfuscate discussion, polarize opinion, and detract from getting a solution?
Besides, even what you said is a sensible start, yet most of America seems far from having a sensible debate about Governance. From outside, every thing that happens is twisted into some sort of attack vector for ... I don't know what.
..because "Parkinson's Law works everywhere." - Mikhail Gorbachev
the irony is that Quote 1 - China Quote 2 - USSR