The article states sources from banking confirmed this theory as well. Not just some lone RCMP.
why would the rcmp want a random gunman to kill 20 innocent civilians? methinks the author is too quick to jump to gov conspiracy
I didn’t read it that way at all. All this article is alleging is that the gunman was connected with the RCMP in some fashion. Not that the RCMP actually wanted him to go on a killing spree.
I’m thinking more along the lines of a confidential informant gone off the rails.
Saying (err typing) "sources" does not equate to actual real life sources - no matter what the topic (or who the publisher) is. This is basic media literacy.