Hacker News Reader

Comment by LatteLazy | Hacker News Reader

Everyone and their dog says WTO isn't enough but you're "sure". No source for that surety, you don't even know enough about the WTO to know how many countries are members. But it's fine, we can trust you. And I'm the bad guy for not being agreeable enough.

This is exactly what is so interesting about brexit, even fundamentalist cults don't have these sort of delusions.

View on HN

https://briefingsforbritain.co.uk/wto-terms-understanding-th... Does not seem that bad to me.

I would read some articles on here https://briefingsforbritain.co.uk/ to try and understand the "cult" that you are so quick to vilify. The tribalism around brexit does no one any favours. This account will soon be useless on here, given the amount of down votes for daring to have a different opinion to the majority of the people on here.

briefingsforbritain is a pro brexit site that pretends not to be. Their whole Advisory Committee are hardcore brexiteers as are the editors etc.

This is another CLASSIC case of Brexiteer-ism. A very bias source pretending it's not. I'm honestly struggling to think of or find an honest, Pro-Brexit source at this point.

The BBC and WTO both have pages on this:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41859691

The WTO have one too:

https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/countries_e/united_king...

Not good...

This reply is another CLASSIC case of remainer-ism. Quoting biased sources like the BBC. At this point there is no point carrying on with this.

Thank you for providing further evidence of my "brexiteer cult" hypothesis.

i didnt have one about remainers until i started talking to you about brexit. But now i do. Thanks!

Once again, making my point for me.

I can say that about you! Funny that.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com