Not in the way most gun-rights advocates portray it; the 2A grew out of a vision that a particular danger to freedom was a standing army, largely because it became a separate subculture and would inevitably be used for internal oppression as well as external defense (modern police forces—standing paramilitary forces devoted exclusively to internal use would be a more extreme example than they had considered) and protecting the RKBA was designed to preserve a model where such forces were unnecessary as the states, individually and collectively, would rely on mobilizing the general militia for security (internal and external), rather than standing professional forces, not as a tool for individuals to resist such forces.